Wanna-B-Fanboy

I initial thought so... but @Tracker posted an article about trump and the citizens of 'mericuh. They are essentially in an abusive relationship: trump being the malignant narcissist serial abuser and the citizens being the abuse victim. And if the 'merican voters soundly reject trump... well what happens when a woman grabs the keys and children and are walking out that door on a malignant narcissistic volatile serial abuser- not going to end well... I thought it was going to awesome to watch it unfold... but man, that put things into perspective... I am actually frightened and concerned for the people of the USA...

edit

Holy ****... you're right he actually managed to bankrupt 'mericuh. Once again... Initially shocked... take a moment and then realize that is totally on brand. There has to be a word for that...

Dafuq? I have no love for HRC, but to say that she was equally bad? give your head a shake man. She 100% would have been a much more competent and less corrupt choice than the asshat-in-chief. 100%. Tell me I'm wrong- with evidence. For every negative thing you can name for HRC, I can easily give you a litany of the same **** trump has done.

Ok. So all this hand wringing and pearl clutching at the lock-down.... two questions: what would liked to have seen happen? Before the lock-down and quarantine process that is now in place. and the next question: Given where we are now, how would like the government to proceed?

I would love to see fox and trump turn on each other... that would be really awesome to watch!

Wow... that was an eye opener- thanks.

Susan Collins of Maine would be concerned.....

True that. It was a very good documentary; highly informative, confirms what we talk about here and pretty much sets out a clear path. I highly recommend it.

Oh boy... It kind of boggles the mind. But then when you sit a sec and think of everything that has passed... it's like yeah, that's totally on brand.

Surreal... yet strangely enough... not at all surprising.

Just in case anyone thought this was anything other than legalized fraud:

Wow. you can see it in real time.

Look at who the POtuS is and then try that question again.

Some context for the above post:

Worth a read.

some much needed good news and inspiration.

Yup... always a tweet

Crank is a pejorative term used for a person who holds an unshakable belief that most of his or her contemporaries consider to be false.[1] A crank belief is so wildly at variance with those commonly held that it is considered ludicrous. Cranks characteristically dismiss all evidence or arguments which contradict their own unconventional beliefs, making any rational debate a futile task and rendering them impervious to facts, evidence, and rational inference.[citation needed] Common synonyms for crank include crackpot and kook. A crank differs from a fanatic in that the subject of the fanatic's obsession is either not necessarily widely regarded as wrong or not necessarily a "fringe" belief. Similarly, the word quack is reserved for someone who promotes a medical remedy or practice that is widely considered to be ineffective; this term, however, does not imply any deep belief in the idea or product they are attempting to sell. Crank may also refer to an ill-tempered individual or one who is in a bad mood, but that usage is not the subject of this article. Although experts in the field find a crank's beliefs ridiculous, cranks are sometimes very successful in convincing non-experts of their views. A famous example is the Indiana Pi Bill where a state legislature nearly wrote into law a crank result in geometry. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Crank_(person)

https://theconversation.com/how-dangerous-are-conspiracy-theories-listen-to-part-five-of-our-expert-guide-136070 "If you present people with the scientific correct information before they’re exposed to the conspiracy theory, then that theory doesn’t have as much impact on people’s attitudes. Whereas if you do it the other way around, and you present people with the conspiracy theory and then the correct information, the conspiracy belief tends to stay there."

don't, he gets off on it.

The Gatreway Pundit is a very reliable source of news and information.... QUESTIONABLE SOURCE A questionable source exhibits one or more of the following: extreme bias, consistent promotion of propaganda/conspiracies, poor or no sourcing to credible information, a complete lack of transparency and/or is fake news. Fake News is the deliberate attempt to publish hoaxes and/or disinformation for the purpose of profit or influence (Learn More). Sources listed in the Questionable Category may be very untrustworthy and should be fact checked on a per article basis. Please note sources on this list are not considered fake news unless specifically written in the reasoning section for that source. See all Questionable sources.

Stacey Abrams looking like a real missed opportunity now....

A statement that embodies when someone doesn't realize they are stupider than a bag of wet hammers

Yeah.. that's about right.