April 17, 201510 yr Not sure it would have mattered in the end but still... "By virtue of the rule, the actions of both players qualified as a violation of goalkeeper interference and should result in a disallowed goal." http://www.tsn.ca/c-mon-ref-should-perry-s-second-goal-have…
April 17, 201510 yr It was the game winning goal. I think it would have mattered. Not like anything can be done now though.
April 17, 201510 yr It was the game winning goal. I think it would have mattered. Not like anything can be done now though. I would like the NHL to respond to this.
April 18, 201510 yr It was the game winning goal. I think it would have mattered. Not like anything can be done now though.I would like the NHL to respond to this. me too but Bettman hasn't posted here in ages
April 18, 201510 yr It was the game winning goal. I think it would have mattered. Not like anything can be done now though.I would like the NHL to respond to this.me too but Bettman hasn't posted here in ages Lol. What a prick.
Not sure it would have mattered in the end but still...
"By virtue of the rule, the actions of both players qualified as a violation of goalkeeper interference and should result in a disallowed goal."
http://www.tsn.ca/c-mon-ref-should-perry-s-second-goal-have…