HardCoreBlue

Countered with ‘hyperbole much, Lol’ as they yell F Trudeau most corrupt evil dictator ever!

They're all cast from the same stone. Everything is transactional with others to help their own personal situations. At any moment CC could go back to supporting Trump if he knew it would help him personally.

C'mon that's their long term goal. Book banning, baby steps.

I'm wondering how much that organization misses Wally Buono's daily influence.

You insult grade four.

Excerpt taken from Sarah Fortinsky The Hill: “Over time, people will see that this is not a case of the Department of Justice conducting a witch hunt,” Barr said in an interview on CBS on Tuesday. “In fact, they approached this very delicately and with deference to the president, and this would have gone nowhere had the president just returned the documents. But he jerked them around for a year and a half.” As the saying goes, I'm not a Lawyer nor do I play one of TV but one of the main tenets of the Law is no one is above it so just returning the documents really should not ensure this went nowhere Trump being a former President or not. Bill Barr thinks we're all idiots with his usual condescending tone. Providing people like Bill Barr a major platform is maddening, frustrating and exhausting.

To me, isn't this what a well thought out intelligent approach looks like when addressing the multitude of things that have to be taken into consideration? Or is it just another F'ing Trudeau ruse?

Or BLM's new story in the Steel City goes similar to ZC's story in the Peg. For the immediate health of our league and excluding our home opener I hope it does.

Almost 50% of Americans emulate and/or support Trump and his handlers. Dangerous. This is not normal, this is not everyone’s bad and it can’t be ignored by treating it as another side of the issue with civility and humour. He is not the only bad guy obviously but he ranks as one of the worst by far. His whole persona and what he represents needs to be flushed away so we can get back to some level of normalcy.

Adam Grant was also the guy to say if you think you need to be an ******* to get ahead, you might be an *******.

You're entitled to your opinions inside your own head. But if you choose to express them out in the world, it's your responsibility to: (1) Ground them in logic and facts (2) Explain your reasoning to others (3) Change them when better evidence emerges. Adam Grant

@JuranBoldenRules What's your take on the Elks? You know wayyyyyy more than I do obviously on the ins and outs of professional football but I don't see a 500 club, I see below that and another wholesale change a coming. For the health of the league sure hope I'm wrong.

Bombers 12-6 Stamps 10-8 Riders 9-9 Lions 8-10 Elks 5-13 Hamilton 12-6 Toronto 10-8 RedBlacks 8-10 Als 6-12 Chris Jones/Geroy Simon first casualties of firings for 2023 season

Replace God with ‘my offshore accounts to hide donations’.

First sentence third paragraph is bang on. To the point and very informed by facts. Tax cuts benefits who the most sorry?

Yup I'd suggest this might be a great example that this isn't 'another side to find the middle ground' type discussion.

Insert Debbie Downer Gif

Wow to your last sentence.

Clearly the fault of Notley.

I’m thinking Jets don’t market to the individual, they market to corporations. The Bombers on the other hand probably balance the two sides a lot more.

Based on your online name, the real season ain’t going to do anything about that and I’m right there with you. Until that final whistle goes, all bets are off.

A not well thought out approach to this complex issue: this is bullshit, it doesn't work, they should be forced into treatment or go to jail, why should my tax dollars go to brain-dead zombies, the results are in (to quote PP) here's a link from the National Post. The truth hurts. Let's think this thru as best we can approach: We need to do something from an evidence informed point of view. Look at this holistically bringing many environmental resources and experts together. We need to do a thorough scan and learn from other countries in how they have approached this. We know we will have our own uniquenesses and nuances to deal with that aren't a perfect fit with other countries approaches. There are limitations and growing pains in this evidence informed approach , some fiscal challenges but it will continue to get us to a better spot (see bolded part). My intention is not to mock, I'm using actual words people use to highlight the different approaches in how complex serious issues are thought thru and how sometimes opinions are presented as facts.

Or let him stand on the sidelines and wreak havoc.

I come in hot on a discussion board with a lot of gaps and misunderstandings with my thinking presented as fact and suggest to people why don't they just look around and ask others because a vast majority of people are thinking what I'm thinking therefore it's the truth and it hurts. People push back with facts and complexities missed in my thinking and understandings, I deploy the victim strategy with mocking overtones. Rinse, repeat.

Corruption crusade. I like it. Well done.