Booch

lets just say this...I train and work out with a lot of the players....I have a good handle and knowledge of what's what and can assure you he is good to go...but out of his hands...team may "claim" otherwise....but this is plain and simple a coaches choice. I alluded to it before that last yr as well...several guys were good to go...for weeks...before getting a sniff...One player well over a month....and there is frustration about it....but what can you do other than look like the bad egg? Alo someone mentioned Adams is over rated here?...funny comment, but hardly true....and to suggest that Thomas...Schmeck...even Haba offers more is laughable....on this team at times players get caught up in the Osh numer's game....and it's not a game that is restricted by ratio...etc...it's Osh personal belief's and preference....believe it if you want...or don't.... any player can be that we have available....and if Cole is inserted it just confirms it was a biased Osh being Osh decidion to begin with.....but he will likely dress Randolph as an 8th oline guy or something stupid like that....haha....or Bridges

Cole isn't hurt...just put there in case we lose so he not a FA being on PR

I not concerned there...ZC knows how to attack the Sssk backfield....and when you have a Lawler...and a Demski.....you can't go wrong there....openings will open up for others...Hopefully they utilize Whitehead more to know the spots to go to...especially when things break down...plus Sask defenders will have to respect him out there

Cole is not hurt and totally good to go....I can 100 percent guarantee that...Osh just going with his guy

If Osh wanted to dress guys who havnt played he should have inserted Person...the unknown factor alone would have produced some positive plays Haba is probably our worst DE on roster now...but he gets the automatic pass as he been here longer than 2 others if we win will be in spite of it...again...You havn't grasped the fact that the players play but also it's the coaching leading up to the game ..the prep...the guys on roster decided by the coach that win or lose for most part....save for some idiotic stupidity by a player for most part games are won and loss as a whole and dependent on coaching....we did a lot of winning and had luxury of guys on the roster who could overcome and gloss over a lot of the bad decisions...we don't have the roster for that now and that luxury....if we win...and I was very confident up to an hour ago it will be due to the offense going off...that defense on the depth chart scares nobody...Maybe we luck out and Sucky Whiney face Harris shows up...he is due....but if not...we in tough

yeah true....that being said, we seen guys who were 100 percent hurt and dressed before No Adams tho makes zero sense....If Osh thinks Thomas and Schmeck are good enough...let alone gonna make any impact he is clearly not as smart as many people give him credit for Just the fact that you are dressing Taylor....who has played zero games...Wilson who has played a handful of games in the first 3rd of season and clearly isnt 100 percent ready, and BA who has missed a few....in a win or go home game is suicide....vet guy not withstanding...there will be rust....especially recognition rust and game speed reaction lag...takes a bit to get it back....talking from experience...this is NOT the game to let guys work it out....a couple even minor miscues/hiccups can and will be the difference of going to Vancouver or going to get your Hefty bag to pack your **** up....Osh as a player should know this....but he gonna dress his Fav's and vets regardless of if they are the best option...again..Osh gonna Osh....

are you really shocked tho?....really?

cant wait to watch the snaps with Thomas/Schmeck and whatever end they put out and Sask just do whatever they want Sad part is that whatever 4 man front we roll with....for most part Fox has to play with Thomas and or Schmeck.....poor Fox

cant argue that

well he did fully practice...and Wilson obviously banged up as a GTD ....and well....past playoff games we dressed and played guys who couldn't even run...so.....

hate to say it again...but said if we lose this one it will be due to coaching and game and roster management...well....first glance tells me we back to old tricks in big games that contribute to the loss

and Armstead and Oullette eat up yards on ground...and clock....and Harris dink and dunks his way up and down field with zero pressure in his face.....hate to say it but unless our offense shots the lights out and controls the time of possession...this may get ugly....

Playoff game...gonna be chilly...running is a huge factor...Sask dressing 2 legit guys who can lug ball....and we have had difficulty with run...and pressure....and we dress 6 dlineman...2 of whom are lucky to make any other roster in the league and if did...would get maybe 4 snaps a game?...Remove your best ST in Cole as well as one of more versatile on defense as well as best sideline to sideline guy.....someone explain this logic to me?....unfuckinbelievable

Biggest game of year...Remove Cole...Adamas...Woods....insert Wilson who hasnt played practically all yr and isnt healthy...add Taylor who hasnt played at all....and BA who hasnt played much...wtf man and why would you tho?....brutal

oh my....brutal dline ....pathetic more like it....not having a good feeling here at all now Wilson as GTD....tells u he aint ready nd if we start him.....oh my...Osh just Oshin ....again....We gonna see Thomas all fricken game being useless Hopefully MOP ZC shows up and puts up 30+ points

hopefully no Hallett in for that 2nd extra DB as well....has failed all yr long...why would it change now? time to try someone else....or scrap it if we don't have a better option

win....if we need to win despite of this or that....so be it....as we have had to before....but that well is slowly running dry and as we have seen...we cant overcome like 2..3 yrs ago....that being said...I feel pretty good about this game ZC is gonna be dialed in, and we are gonna see a couple things on both sides of the ball that we will ask ourselves "where the fack has that been all year?!!?!?"

Wallace back already....

Yeah... I think deserved to be on it.....I'd take him as our safety any day, but the whining is a bad look...Must be Hangry again lol Nichols got the snub.....you don't hear him whining...he's been snubbed a lot....just keeps his nose down and works.....safe in the fact he knows his peers and other players know he is the best

yeah...basically they not as good as anyone's....but 3 all-stars in it....laughable

weighted for the whole season I would say Griffin has been in our top 4 defenders If I'd have to rank them for over all season I'd say Nichols....Ford...Griffin...Woods....Bonds.....if Garbutt played whole yr he would have put a real solid rookie season together and it would have flowed to WJ who for all arguments sake had a solid yr....and was used in an odd manner....His holding back playing pass lane disruptor was by scheme....not his free lancing or taking plays off But with WJ...and Nichols as the older vets thats 5 other solid pieces to work with moving forward....and thats not including Fox..Lawson...Adams...Ayers....Person....and Jones.....regardless if we pick up a free agent or find some gem in our scouting/draft we have the makings for a legit defence already....and when camp breaks and another guy makes it impossible to not roster...even better The way I see it Thomas...Biggie...Wilson....BA....Schmeck don't even need to be in camp.....purge that salary and allocate it elsewhere...

he seemed to slowly got on board with that last half of season....so I have a positive feel for ZC going into the WF...

and not to be biased....But Bonds too

ZC has been sneakily efficient and almost tactician like of late...Is this the play-off yr he actually looks MOPish???

I just think in the makeup of the CFL salary structure....and the limited roster any contract...for anyone really that is in excess of 500..550k is just not a good move and the bang not worth the buck, Such a fine line between allowing for nice accessory talent to compliment it, let alone have sustained roster continuity with proven vets in their prime when you start breeching 500k a yr. You see it often in the CFL where a team has to rob Peter to pay Paul and you have a deficient roster We got lucky here with guys taking less to allow for an excessive vet laden roster....but thats not the norm, and likely won't see that again in the amount of guys, and the size of shave guys left on the table And especially if you aren't a team that is hugely successful with draft/scouting to find top end entry level guys....you riding a slippery slope paying a QB 700k+ and then trying to lock in a couple guys to throw too that are top tier and gonna cost you likely 200k each per yr at minimum if you lucky....and thats not even factoring in 5 quality oline guys to protect that asset. And oh yeah...what about your defense??? 700K+ NEXT yr and over 800k the following....if that not a lead anchor I don't know what is