GCn20

They do need to build a culture there though, so he can be helpful in that regard.

I can't wait for the win this weekend. We need it around here.

Rigmaiden was a massive blow for sure. We are actually quite lucky we even had him for a couple years because of clash of personalities in BC.

Receivers I disagree with, and returners? How would we know? We haven't, in earnest, been looking for one since we scooped up Grant.

How so? Not saying you are right or wrong, but what have they not done that leads you to this conclusion?

I didn't expect you would get the point. 90% of your posts stem from a horribly inaccurate interpretation of another members post.

No..that's karma...prove me wrong..I'll wait. Point being that because you don't believe in it, doesn't mean it doesn't exist and even if it doesn't and someone still thinks it does, why try over rule their belief in what goes around comes around. More, not less, people should be adhering to that mantra.

Pretty remote chance of him doing that.

They were ahead of us early last season too.

And Edmonton snatches defeat from the jaws of victory. Those poor Elk fans. Even when their team looks better than the opposition...

True..the difference is that Winnipeg played far below their capability and the Riders are playing to their's.

Seems like a pretty unproven group of receivers. Maybe they are good? Maybe they are crap? I am not sure how anyone could come to any kind of opinion on them right now because no one knows who the hell they are really. ONE receiver out of this group exceeded 700 yards last year...barely.

Most teams don't have any NATs capable of starting in the secondary. If they do they will almost always be playing field corner, or safety. That's just the facts. The field corner is the hardest/longest throw to make for a QB and most often is where teams lineup there 5th receiver. There is more time to react for the DBs. The hashmarks moving in made it marginally tougher for DBs but it still allows the most margin for error for any of the DB positions.

I agree, I just don't see him throwing a ton of balls though. We have Zac for that. Not worried about BO finding holes whatsoever. That is literally the one thing that OL can do easily without a lick of practice together. Pass pro, that's a different story. BO will go off for over 100.

If Streveler isn't in as a gadget guy do we really want him on the field much? If he's playing, it's because we are running a series of plays intended to give the D a change of pace. I do hope we allow him opportunities to throw as well, but let's make no mistake the Bombers will put Strev out there with Brady to run a very run heavy play package. Zach will be just fine in his playmaking ability. Saying he struggled last year is overstating things. He had his best statistical year as a Bomber last year. Ford is playing the easiest position there is in the secondary. He will be fine. I'm not anticipating that Gauthier takes the majority of reps...very doubtful on that.

Three stripes and an asterisk.

Cody plays above his head about every eighth game. I doubt he puts together two in a row.

So "Canada's Team" with the self proclaimed best and most loyal diehard fans in all of pro sports took a 1.1 million dollar loss last year. Humble pie followed by a giant serving of crow is currently being served in the big rectangle.

He can start, he just shouldn't play much beyond the first snap.

Makes the game a little easier to watch for the casual fan. Never a bad thing.

Jake has been on a limited snap count for 2 years now. If you got the snap count numbers I'd love to see them, because if he took more snaps than Walker I'll eat my hat. Also, same goes for Jeffcoat if you look at snaps while they were both in the lineup.

We've seen Jake listed as a starter many, many times over the past several years and then take limited snaps. I think in a pinch Adams would be just fine at end. It will be nice to get Garbutt back tho.

If we are dressing a ton of DL something has to give.

For sure. We saw this the past 3 years already. MOS declares a NAT a starter...we all scream bloody murder and that NAT gets 10% of the reps. Yea, not even much dead weight on the PR. We are sure looking deep this year.

Trick question. none of them will be able to walk into a bar. Limp into, wheel into, crutch into....that's the entry.