Mike

To me, and I don't mean to simplify this ... Ekakitie at TC looked like an out of shape, sloppy mess. When I've seen him in practice lately, he looks WAY better.

Can't see how it will ever be Flanders anymore. I just don't really see the need for TO, we rotate Corney Westerman Jeffcoat just fine.

Well I'm going to have to do that.

The only game I noticed it not working at was last game. I've noticed that it temporarily glitches some other times too, but for the most part, it seems pretty bang on. Last game was a mess, though.

What he's saying is that it's not the Bombers, the stats are from the league directly - same engine that the website updates from.

what is this tell me more

That isn't how I remember it.

I was looking at Montreal's roster (this week's DC is not up) and man they are beat up. They only had 6 Canadians listed on their depth chart as starters last week and as far as I can tell, the backup choices they had were pretty grim.

I agree.

Underrated in all this is Corney. He's out there with Westerman lots.

Me too - but it's gotta be either Roc or Okpalaugo. Can't be a Canadian, so Ekakitie will dress, which tells me it's probably TO, since I can't see them dressing 8 DL and 6 DB.

I don't really think it's any different - they're not increasing their flexibility at all by doing this. They rotate Hurl and Thomas anyways. I think Okpalaugo is a scratch though (or Carmichael but that'd be thin at DB) with Foketi.

I hope Jones never earns another dollar off combat sports again in his life. Absolute scum.

Seems like more of a fluff piece than anything to be honest, but hey, if Walker isn't a Bomber then I hope he's a Buc.

Depends on where we're at when he's ready to come back, but if he comes back willing and able to play the last 6 games of the season + playoffs, I'd throw a prorated 200k at him, which would be 66k-ish - and I'd give him whatever we need to upfront. Can you imagine a group of receivers made up of Walker-Adams-Dressler-Thorpe-JFG?

I wouldn't doubt it was orchestrated by Murphy. Remember when he organized the signing of Pacman Jones for us so that Pacman could go online and stream to fans high as a kite talking about how he was going to play corner, receiver, kick returner, punt returner and score 4 touchdowns a game?

Awwww shucks Trent changed his mind. He didn't realize he'd have to sign for two years.

Let's play a game called "Guess Which Way Trent Went"

I don't care if Richardson was the nicest guy on the planet. He was the 3rd overall pick in the NFL Draft and washed out after 3 seasons. He is *that* bad.

I'm sure they'll be interested. I can't see him wanting a two year deal. It'd make sense for him to want to sign a deal for the balance of this year, go attend tryouts again in the off-season and then if that doesn't pan out, open himself up to a big money deal in free agency when every team can make a play for him. If that's the route he goes, only playoff teams make sense.

Very well could be a reality. If he came free, the likely reality is that he's going to probably be with one of three teams - Calgary, Winnipeg or Toronto. What they offer is the most appealing - a deal for the remainder of the year with the ability to play with a great QB and earn playoff money.

Oh and I think it's a pretty fair assumption to say he's not going to make the Bucs. He's super low on the totem pole there.

I can't see the Eskimos going after him, to be honest. They have Bowman, Zylstra and Williams. Walker is going to have no allegiance to a new GM. Honestly, I could see him in Calgary and that scares the **** out of me. I'd love to think we'd be interested, but it'd probably be one of two things - a 1 year deal or the end of Dressler. He IS, however, exactly what we could use.

Good grief LOL good luck with that is right

You just finally acknowledged the only point I've been making this whole time and agreed with it, then implied I'm the one disputing things? I honestly don't know what your point is, because it seems to change every post. At first, it was that he's making the key kicks. Then all the kicks are key kicks, but he's not making all of the kicks either. Now it's that if he didn't make easy kicks, we could've lost? Here's my belief: the key kicks are the kicks that we pay him to make because the other kickers aren't capable of making them. If we just wanted him to make every single 30 yarder that adds up to enough points to cover the margin of victory, I'm sure Hugh O'Neill could do that at a much fairer price. We're paying him to make the 50 yard game winners, the 55 yarders to take leads, the big kicks with the game on the line. And he's not making all of those.