wbbfan

Thats the truth, look at how andrew harris did early last year before we sorted out the ol. His ypc was like 3.8 and no tds till week 6. 206 yards 3.88 ypc 41.2 rushing yards per game. 0 rushing tds. First 5 449 yards 4.98 ypc 89.8 rushing yards per game and 4 rushing tds. Next 5

Some, id say the minority. I think he is much better off getting starters reps. He is a guy whose contract is based off one game. That at rb especially is the stuff of over rating. Over priced? Good money for a 1 game guy at a position your teams offense doesnt use. Does that scream great, high value deal to you? A lot of people are also kind of out of touch i guess with NI depth / 7th starter money.

yes but we went in with a lot of expired salary and a low cap the previous year. Thats the difference.

lafrance to ssk is supposed to be done. Seems like they are spending like drunk sailors again. I would like to see him have the chance to start. Too bad he wont have a chance to play on a good offense.

dollars and sense, they soo often go hand in hand. As in the hand full of money covers up the sense.

would have really liked to have him back. Awesome ster with up side, but I dont think he full fills that potential.

Yeah so long as thats the kind of money he is making itd be a good move. A bit surprising but if the price is right its great.

is this fitting into the actual salary cap or under the jones roster rules?

so dump our best OL last year who is still on his pre break out contract for an expensive fa?

A rotation of the two would be optimal. But I really want to see what butcher does in camp, rather then have him veteran'd out.

corney no. jake the snake yes.

thats a real good pick up.

fantastic news!

lets get ready to rummbllleeeeeeeee. Prolly more like humble here in bomber ville but weve had a pretty good off season soo far.

easy to find yes. easy to find high end ones? not so much. Its like rbs. You can bring in 10 guys with every kind of back ground possible and all them arent bad but none of them are special. If its a guy whose a dangerous returner id take a FA for sure. A guy like rainey, banks, maybe logan would be good. Although if we are going to have fogg as the back up DB id use him as the returner too.

Too whiny and emo for my liking. Even the first 2. The 3rd was fantastic 4 bad. Couldnt come near close to finishing it. Im not a fan of the really young portrayal of peter parker.

Yeah, ledgers joker handily saves it for me but DKR was not a fan of at all. It feels like they just wanted to rush into the frank miller story line knowing how epic it was but then half arsed it. They didnt have to keep the nolan verse, I think it would have been safe to move into the more supernatural especially with ras al ghoul. That with the gritty, dark feel of batman vs what we saw prior to batstiffler nolan would have gone a long ways. Ehh, idk. fantastic 4, most of the xmen movies, hulk wasnt great, and the majority of comic book / spiderman fans did not like those movies either. And they didnt age or end well. Going into iron man marvel was in a hole. Their approach was to use fantastic casting, and slow methodical story/world building + a fantastic pile of back stories to lure people in. They went candy in a van. DCCU went crazed flasher in a trench coat. But DC has certainly dug out of a ton of holes in the past. The comic crash, comic code crack down, batman and robin etc. If they take a breather from the movies, then come back in a couple years with that same awesome casting taking time to tell a few characters stories they could salvage it. But they wont. money money money money!

yeah wont be fun for sure. The off season in general for the front office isnt tho.

practice does not a pro football player make. tee martin and robert marve looked great in practice. Tony ortiz and a ton of other guys too. Joshua bostick.

Yep. Over crowding the movies has been a major point of suckage.

which considering the source material, and strength of characters they have to work with is just mind boggling. As a comics fan i was allways more into DC, but the movies have been incredibly one sided.

Its not a thin draft, its top heavy. And the top tier is strong enough to get a bunch of them NFL interest. Its very high risk high reward even for the cfl draft. With our NI depth, having the chance to draft a star NI is better then for sure being able to bring in a guy who might become a starter at peak.

hurl, neufeld, and smith (are keeping, macho, gurley pending FAs? if not them) The down grade in cost from Mlb, 1 dt, and the back up qb spot, should all be a decent savings as well. I doubt we fill all those spots with equal money to what we spent on them last year. The OL is an interesting spot for us. With our picks we can target a good one, plus couture and foketi and i imagine intzandt on the PR. If we end up with a drafted OL, couture or foketi as one of our 5 best OL we could try and trade some one like bryant for value and cap flexibility. Not that i want to move bryant, but its a nice option to have.

not to mention if they would move on from smith. Dressler and adams + denmark is cheaper and better then with smith. I wouldnt be against bringing him back at a more appropriate price.

michael bishop 2 was tee martin. Or would he be 1.0 and bishop 2.0? MBT is more pat barnes 2.0