Wanna-B-Fanboy

Good catch- I wonder if there has been any explanation for that. Looking forward to a notrickszone spin on that. At a cursory glance- the website is not credible and the graph... I don't even know what t hat graph is suppose to show. I did notice the "charity tip jar" link at the bottom of that chart. Also, what "wild claim" are you demanding data for? C'mon man- that is a **** site that purposely misleads and cherry picks data and presents data in a dishonest and distorted manner. It's been discredited and debunked many times in this thread alone. How do you expect us to take your arguments and points seriously when you keep trotting out the same shitty support of your "facts". I would love it if you were right and that all this is "alarmist" stuff. I want to be able to have a good honest discussion with you about Climate Crisis, but we can't have that dialogue if you keep using dodgy sources and thoroughly discredited propaganda websites as support for your view point.

Hopefully the same- otherwise you need to see your doctor. 😁

to be fair... a bag of **** is more useful than the riders.

She really is, her authenticity really underscores that.

Where is @The Unknown Poster? I haven't seen him around.

Solid article about Warren with a Canadian twist. https://www.cbc.ca/amp/1.5190801

A few members addressed this a few weeks ago. Notricks is a bad site to get informed about climate crisis.

notricks is nothing but tricks though. if these are your sources for information on climate crisis, then yeah I understand your skepticism- that is exactly what those sites are supposed to do and are funded to do. You've been had, man- sorry to say. I totally understand where you are coming from now.

No one insults you for having a differing opinion, so please stop with that.

That is no better- that is a known climate misinformation dispenser, heavily funded by oil and gas companies. In fact it is worse than notrick- because it is much better funded and much looser with their science "facts"

Why do you keep posting articles from that website. It has been thoroughly discredited. Try something less... shitty. Its a **** site.

You just reiterated what Week left posted. "In summary, the mid-Holocene, roughly 6,000 years ago, was generally warmer than today, but only in summer and only in the northern hemisphere. More over, we clearly know the cause of this natural warming, and know without doubt that this proven “astronomical” climate forcing mechanism cannot be responsible for the warming over the last 100 years."

Looks like Warren did well and Beto bombed. Good. I think Beto would have been a good replacement for Ted Cruz. I feel that he shouldn't be in the race for POTUS though... he has no concrete plans and seems to go on feelings. Good showing by Booker though. A Warren/Booker 2020 ticket would be pretty good and hit all the strategic boxes too.

By all accounts Kito was a stud and easily a top three pick in the regular draft. I don't blame Joe Mack for taking him- it was a smart pick at the time.

Looks very possible for Warren... awesome. I am pretty stoked to see the Democrats debate- we will finally get some answers to who is a contender and who are the pretenders.

Aw ****! it's ******* wednesday.... Ugh- here I thought it was Thursday. Well... my week just got longer- hate that. Bye-weeks are THE WORST.

Tarsky works better me thinks Tarsky and Hecht... as someone pointed out earlier.

SOlid and informative post- thanks!

Well, this has been going on for awhile... have they fixed the ambulance problem? https://globalnews.ca/news/3945798/health-officials-downplay-row-of-ambulances-outside-winnipeg-hospital/

As an aside, it’s worth noting that even if the Holocene had been as warm as or warmer than today, it would do nothing to undermine the theories and data that indicate today’s warming is rapid and anthropogenic. That is a wonderful link- thanks for that. I guess that will be my source when a poster links a dubious study or uses a study for misrepresenting facts.

So what is your point? You posted two studies, what are you trying to show people Here? Not trying to be obtuse Here, but I am not sure what you are trying to show us.

I am sure they will... just not nearly as many as the shmoes will.

Nice vampire Kiwi reference!

1% is for margin of error.