blitzmore Posted November 21, 2014 Report Share Posted November 21, 2014 Regardless there was definitely an issue with the team. Maurice has corrected most of it. But there are still a player or two who doesn't show up every game. like who? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The Unknown Poster Posted November 21, 2014 Author Report Share Posted November 21, 2014 Regardless there was definitely an issue with the team. Maurice has corrected most of it. But there are still a player or two who doesn't show up every game. like who? Buff for one. Although his games off are a lot less under Maurice then they were under Noel. Seems like generally more accountability in the locker room than years past. Ladd was no great shakes earlier this season either. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The Unknown Poster Posted November 21, 2014 Author Report Share Posted November 21, 2014 The original "rumour" has been updated with details.... Kane & Prospect to Bruins for "Top Six (Probably Loui Eriksson) and Torey Krug". Not close to enough. How about Reilly Smith and Doug Hamilton. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
sweep the leg Posted November 21, 2014 Report Share Posted November 21, 2014 The original "rumour" has been updated with details.... Kane & Prospect to Bruins for "Top Six (Probably Loui Eriksson) and Torey Krug". Not close to enough. How about Reilly Smith and Doug Hamilton. I'd take Smith & Hamilton for Kane. I doubt the Bruins would have any interest in that though. I think they'd be crazy to trade Hamilton. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The Unknown Poster Posted November 21, 2014 Author Report Share Posted November 21, 2014 I like Ericksson and I know his name has come up in Jets trade rumours before. He'd be great if he was an "extra" piece the Jets wanted to replace Kane's offense in the short term. But at 29 years old and only one more season before UFA, there isnt a chance that he's the big piece coming back in a Kane trade. it would literally have to be Eriksson, Krug, a first and Smith for Kane and Burmi. Fun to speculate but no logic behind this rumour whatsoever... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now