17to85

Well and if you insist on Canadians at dl, then don't waste time with a Canadian in the secondary. If you want a Canadian safety then all American on DL and get a ferocious bunch who can terrorize a qb.

Technically we lost that game because replay gave it to Toronto and then apologized after the fact.

The 2 singles aren't a big deal IMO, the complete lack of offense in the 2nd half though.... yeah that's a problem. Also giving away big plays for free on D.

From your lips to God's ears.

Unfortunately we've tried collaros twice against calgary already and it was fugly

Adding woods could have been huge for thr DL. Liked what he did last year.

Zach has gotten worse compared to 5 years ago too... you're spending all your time focusing on the problems of streveler and Wilson meanwhile just hoping that collaros can turn back the clock... Collaros will hit some more bombs right now that's true... but he will also get sacked a bunch and thrown ints as well. So I guess in your opinion you roll the dice on hitting enough deep shots to win and that being the best chance? The only, and I mean only time this team has been successful offensively the last couple seasons has been when Brady carries it on his back.

Are we sure Goalie isn't Mike O'Shea?

My exact thoughts. Untouchable for 1/3 of the season and then gone.

Disagree and that is not a not a big rah rah streveler statement. Collaros has been ass other than a few random deep shots.

Considering the complete lack of traction the O had that game you take the guaranteed points all the time. One on one is totally different if you got a 6'2 receiver on a 5' 8 db as well but when it's the other way around... just dumb.

Unless you're like me and always right

People were skeptical of the OC hire, nothing seems to have alleviated those concerns

Did someone rightly call him an idiot for that answer? I mean he knows that missing that play can lead to a turnover right? Situational awareness is huge as a coach and it was lapos main flaw

Corcoran?

"No that ain't it" Mike O'Shea... probably

If Mitchell plays well someone should be answering some very uncomfortable questions.

That's what I'm saying, the first INT, the guy wallace was blocking got free and drifted into the throwing lane to get hands in the way. Now we praised Willie to high heavens for doing stuff like that, but if Wallace stayed on that block the INT never happens. The deep shot I hated from the get go. was off target and the receiver had no seperation anyway. felt like a total desperation throw to try and hit something deep. was it qb or the playcall? I dunno. Third one why the **** are we even throwing the ball there? run into the middle twice and kick a field goal, go up 9 with limited time left. Don't even be throwing let alone throwing a jump ball for a half foot mismatch in height. so yeah I maintain that the qbs are less a problem than receivers who can't make plays or get open intermediate to deep and an OL that is inconsistent.

Ed Tait and Randy Turner articles the day after a game were great stuff.

Are the riders good? No, never.

I still feel it's less the qbs and more everything around them.

Tait is a good writer and always was. He's got a nice job being the Bombers hype man right now but that doesn't diminish how he set himself apart based on his work prior to taking that gig.

Counter point it took nearly a full half for collaros to out pass janarion grant last game. Thenoffense is pretty ******* limited with both qbs.

He's getting his chance now... if it keeps looking like that then sure try something else. Wasn't working with collaros, we give streveler some games see what happens.

When guys are obviously not cutting it (ie. Kolankowski) you should be giving other players opportunities to try.