Booch

but really...we have enough ST guys anyway...and I sure a Canadian who has had reps there before...can be adequate in that role when we playing one of the better offenses in the league...with minimal defensive depth and 2 guys fresh off the 6 game Just look at BC depth chart...and rotational depth they have on defense....and what they have been doing this yr...then look at ours....and correlate it to the issues we have been plagued with on defense...BC defense is gonna be fresh all game and bringing the heat...so hopefully Buck has schemed for it...looking at their depth chart doesnt have me feeling too good

but we have one of our fullbacks from last yr on roster now tho...and thats not a scheme you scheme for, as you don't know where he is lining up, or if he is dropping out...so that would be pointless

but we have a backup fullback who is one of our DA's...so we good...we started the8...9 dlineman trend a few yrs back....surely we faking teams out to follow suit and burn a DA spot on a pointless player...Kudos to you coach Osh...u sneaky s.o.b

IF we used him on the dline...or even just tried him out a few snaps then I'd be somewhat ok with it...but still not ideal...

then why he on roter?..I'd say a return from an achilles and a CB who had a foot issue is more vital to back up than a fullback who may get a handfull of snaps...especially when we have had games this yr where we didnt even dress/declare one on the depth chart Meanwhile BC has 9 dlineman dressed...and 8 DB's....Their defense wont be getting gassed or have injury issues......again Next to Nichols...Parker is our next best HB...sorry all u Holm lovers nut thats a fact

we do have some coverage....but shuffling 3 guys around to replace 1 guy in event of injury isn't ideal...or smart either....plus the fact you go into a game where good field position might be a key thing in winning, but u pooch the only true PR guy you had on roster...basically for a fulback....is just.....dumb....anyway you look at it

but Osh is perfect.....so I hear here...his main flaw...for yrs...is still there...and actually getting worse tbh

and a rotation we were somewhat first to do and excel at...thats the funny part

Lions will be without Dlineman Josh Banks for tomorrows game....how much does anyone wanna bet BC doesn't dress a useless DA fullback....or feel need maybe for another Olineman to stand around all game?...I bet they also have adequate back-up in the defensive backfield....guess we will see shortly Far from it...and you have 2 guys coming back on defense from injury, and there is always the risk that they could re-aggravate....yet you remove the one guy who could fill in for 3 spots on defense in case that happens...in favor of a fullback who likely only sees special teams reps now, as why would you us him on offence and have to replace an american receiver??

having football knowledge....and actually using it seems to have no place here in some regards....baffling indeed

It's guy...plain and simple....You think Hall or Younger wouldn't want an extra DB or Dlineman instead of a fullback who will see what...maybe a few snaps on teams now that we have our National Fullback back on roster?....I sure they silently shaking their heads too but wont say it out loud And Parker is an actual PR....McCrae is not...and this game may be a battle of field position, or having good field position to start drives could be key...so hey lets neuter our ability for a possible edge there too....while the Dline gets gassed for a 3rd straight game

Or dress a backup dline man who can actually be usefulI?... i guess tho when u have Bennett and rapidly declining Thomas u have no need

for all the Osh defenders and people who think he can do wrong...who truly thinks this is the best use of the roster??...like really??

yeah if they declare only 1 starter on defence than Kramdi or Thomas/Lawson can be subbed for freely....be a nice option to toss in Fox to the dline mix all game....but oh wait...we chose to dress an American fullback with one of our DA spots.....for minimal pointless use now that we have Burtenshaw back.....

YUP....And again....stubborn Osh refusing to use the Nationalized American rule....basically because he doesnt like it as there is no other reason not to....

yup...no need to start him there ratio wise, and BC receivers will chew him u and spit him out....Get your starting National fullback back...and still burn a DA spot on an American one so you have to remove your only true punt returner in Parker and a guy who can play SAM...CB...and HB.....or go into game lean on the Dline where u could have dressed Fox, or the new DE...again another example of a pathetic use of the roster....but didnt expect anything different to be honest

and...with Burtenshaw back...we still burn a DA on Jackson....and dont add a DL guy...or keep Parker on...like wtf Oshea??...again....just questionable stupid roster management...

That was last game... Hence my earlier comments that I was told he can be a bit of a knob/doucher on the field Parker also repped heavy at HB this week...and he was the projected starter before he got hurt Tait doesn't set let alone create the roster

we dressed both last game tho....so could see that again

If we plan on starting Kramdi at SAM again (just barfed in my mouth a bit) as well as Holm and Parker again, I would hope we go the route of sitting Darby and rostering one of Fox or the new DE in his place....if Kramdi sucks, or gets hurt, or another DB gets hurt we have coverage there in the back end with that extra import DB...Parker can play HB/CB and SAM and they say Holm can play corner and HB...so we be good in any event there We designate the 6 National starters on offence (Neuf/Gray/The Center/BO/Woli/Demski) and 1 on defence....(DT) and that way we can slap the Jeffs with Fox and Walker freely....or the 3 ends and one of Fox /Walker...gives us a good 7 man dline rotation with Lawson , Thomas and Bennett. It's not ideal with Kramdi there tho with Leos receivers as I could see him getting roasted over and over again, but with Darby pulled off roster it does allow us that extra dline guy which is sorely needed. On obvious passing downs we could also go Wilson/Biggie/Cole or Parker with Lawson on the nose with the Jeffs...and imagine actually utilizing the Nationalized American for 23 snaps on defence and really being able to put some unique combos out there......dare to dream I guess as that makes a whole lotta sense With way roster has been tooled tho, it wont surprise me to see Jackson still in eating up a DA spot...Wilson for Cole hampering our ST, and some pointless player for Beeksma with only one making sense Rose in for Swarmay....guess we shall see tomorrow

thats what I would assume

I think B.C's greatness is overblown too....looking at it...They beat CY in game 1 where CY didn't know their butts from their faces.....and then got to beat up on the Riders and Edm again.....I think their dominance...or perceived dominance is bolstered somewhat with 3 games against the 2 worst teams in the league...Thursday will definitely be the measuring stick of who is the tops in the West

dont like hot dogs tho....nope lol

Prob best in the league...thats why I think we could slide him in at SAM and be better than ever there we've sorely misswd Wilson as a whole on defense....getting him back is huge....Same with Rose...I can see it elevating some guys play too as they will feed off their enthusiasm

damn how did I miss that one!