Blueandgold

He’s a good gadget player.. This says nothing about his ability as a every down receiver.

I can’t wait to see that number to drop 5 out of 7 in the playoffs.

Can’t wait for the “well Nichols beat Calgary posts” while the posters fail to acknowledge that Nichols had absolutely nothing to do with that win.

I thought he was going to be the next Fantuz. He really didn't pan out at all.

I can't re-watch 01, 07 or 11 until we win one. I just can't put myself through that.

I saw Darvin Adams drop an an easy catch, I saw Bailey make nice catches down the field. Maybe instead of Streveler you should think about our OC and receiving core. Mike Reilly wouldn’t be hitting our guys on deep balls.

Adams has played quite poorly this year and it hasn't really been mentioned until this week. I know Matthews was a healthy scratch for Montreal, but I have to wonder if we would've been better off keeping him around. It's interesting that everyone is quick to put Streveler through the ringer, especially when almost everyone can agree that our receiving core has had major issues. Adams has shown a lack of fight, Whitehead is useless in our O and Demski is almost a gadget player himself. That doesn't even take into account the terrible playing calling we've been saddled with all year. What kind of production can we really expect from a young QB in an offense like this?

1. Streveler 2. Harris 3. Secondary HH - The OL & Hardrick particularly.

Bailey tried to run before catching the ball. I like Bailey and he’s made some huge plays but he can’t keep leaving plays on the turf. The lack of Lawlers involvement has surprised me today.

Not really sure that I agree. Our D looks quite similar to how it’s looked all year and we’re dominating the time of possession. We looked great through three Qs against Montreal in game one as well.

How can that play stand? The ball was clearly released after Adams was over the LOS wasnt it?

You have to take a shot at the end zone, we just have to execute better and Strev has to make a better decision If the play isn’t there.

I was coming to say what a great half Streveler had and then he makes that throw. Oh boy.

Bailey sure isn’t doing much to repay the confidence we all had in him.

Finally correcting the mistake made when Whitehead was re-inserted for Bailey.

I’m sure Eskimo fans would say we had no business winning the Strevelers first start with our passing numbers.

I agree with Calgary beating Saskatchewan, I personally always hope the Riders get humiliated (its hard for me to cheer for them even if it benefits the Bombers) but a Riders loss still gives us a chance to get first place if we can get our **** together.

I'm sure it would please you to know that CFL_News is ran by Rider Stronson, one of the more obnoxious rider fans.

How can all of us see that the receiving core we used in the Banjo Bowl is superior to the one we're using now but not our coaching staff? Bailey played a hell of a game against the Riders and earned a spot in the lineup, especially over a guy like Whitehead who's absolutely useless in our O. His injury is nonexistent.

I'm no Nichols fan, but Collaros is significantly worse than Nichols. Honestly, I can't believe I'm even saying this, but I would've rather seen Kevin Glenn come out of retirement to try and get his ring than bring Collaros in.

Strev and MOS are guaranteed a GC appearance? In what world? If Strev is in Toronto (and I like Strev) I hope it’s because Masoli or Arbuckle is here.

Is he even healthy? Is he an upgrade over Strev? I’m replacing the OC before I even consider the QB.

Why is Lapo being mentioned as a possible HC? He’s not coming back as our OC, let alone HC.

Yeah this is an odd point, the Riders scored more points in this last game against us than they did in either of the LD or BB.

If we want to turn this thing around, we need to make some changes. Inserting Bailey for Lucky, Gray for either guard, and firing Lapo would be a nice start.