17to85

Dude you've totally gone off the deep end. Have a snickers!

No one says this. Like i said, hyperbole

That doesn't compute... game lost in OT and gifting the opposition a touchdown isn't as big as a dropped pass? But look we pay collaros a literal **** ton of money... most in the league... he shouldn't be giving away free points in tight games.

Thanks for the contribution. You have effectively ignored the entire nuance that is at the heart of this discussion.

Don't get me wrong I don't see what Jackson brings to the roster at all, but he doesn't make or break a team. The guys paid to be the stars need to be the stars.

No stats don't mean everything... but if your offense waits until the 2nd half to start playing ball you make life harder on your D from the get go. The offense it littered with stars and they are paid accordingly. That has been the issue most of the year nothing else. An underachieving offense. Yes we could make the Ds life a bit easier with haba and Hansen in but that's really not the huge issue some people make it out to be. Kramdi for all the **** he takes from some is not playing poorly. Parker didn't improve the punt return game one bit. A lot of this is being blown massively out of proportion because of some people having differing opinions on some players.

You know what was a bigger issue than the D getting tired later in the game? 0 passing yards and 0 completed passes in the first quarter. I don't care what the roster looks like that is unacceptable.

Horrendous, atrocious, these are the issues I have. It's hyperbole. It could be better but it's not ad bad as all that. You guys have different ideas and that's fine, but just because it's different doesn't make it horrendous.

There is a difference between horrendous and sub-optimal.

This is an over reaction. It's not horrendous, it's a couple questionable moves. If you can make a move or two and all is well it's not horrendous.

Don't make me explain again how this both sides crap is exactly what the bad faith actors in politics want.

I just see a team that could use meaningful depth on the DL pretty badly and they refuse to make the changes to get it.

So I can find the logic in the invisible man Bennett being rostered, I can see the logic in a lot of what they do, but for the life of me I can not see the logic in using a roster spot on Jackson at all. He can't take meaningful reps on either offense or defense and neither is he some kind of indispensable special teamer... just don't know what he bring to this roster.

O'Shea has made puzzling roster moves going way back though. Still a good coach still no-one I'd rather have but from the beginning he has had some head scratchers.

If they wilted constantly they would have been blown out a bunch. They do fight back and win or lose some close ones so they don't wilt. They keep fighting. They might come in sloppy but seldom do they wilt.

Also, big angry German certainly won't hurt the special teams coverage. In short 2 simple additions to make the team better.

One Haba on the roster please. Would help so much to keep the Jeffs fresh all game long.

First Republicans tried to kill their base with covid, now they are outright begging to get them killed in a "civil war".... this has to be some kind of bet regarding how obvious to they have to be before the morons will stop supporting them.

I promise you no team in the league thinks the Bombers aren't going to be a tough physical opponent. Notice how far more riders were slow getting up on Sunday than Bombers?

No piped in crowd noise this week either

Yeah except I think it was a cost thing so who else you cut?

It's not that they can't, but when the cfl added more DI spots they got used on D, particularly DL to great effect. Like probably the single biggest detriment to offense league wide.