-
Posts
10,045 -
Joined
-
Last visited
-
Days Won
49
Content Type
Profiles
Forums
Events
Articles
Everything posted by Mike
-
2023/2024 CFL (Non Bombers) Off Season News
Mike replied to Noeller's topic in Blue Bomber Discussion
There’s genuinely some surprises around the league … I’d be interested in Bennett for sure and McFadden from Toronto -
2023/2024 CFL (Non Bombers) Off Season News
Mike replied to Noeller's topic in Blue Bomber Discussion
I would take Lenius here -
Yeah I should’ve clarified, I’m happy we didn’t keep Yoshi. Just meant we could’ve.
-
They’ll announce them tomorrow I would assume
-
Almost definitely
-
I’ve pretty much got the same idea for a roster as JBR but I do think I’d take Bridges over Fuller and I’d take Moses over Gemmel
-
I’m just gonna say Moses because I didn’t actually watch much of that dumpster fire but I’m still cheering for my pick
-
We don’t have a LB named Adams
-
I too think Upshaw is better but I don’t claim to ever know exactly what I should be looking for on the DL
-
This is just the cherry on top of the let’s make training camp as pointless as possible sundae Before you all jump all over me, yeah there are guys to be excited about but this is two years in a row now we’ve just completely misused our preseason
-
You don’t
-
Agreed Hubert is a surprise so far
-
Griffin is horrible
-
Whoever decided to play only a pure rookie and a guy who’s been here for 5 days …. Wow
-
That is very true. Risk it for the biscuit.
-
I love it but let’s be honest that was an ugly choice in a game that meant something
-
It’s just bad reporting overall, the context behind this situation makes it all seem very reasonable. Richmond had job opportunities in the US and to make it worth his while to stay, he needed to be at a certain pay tier. Everyone involved handled this properly, it just didn’t work out.
-
That’s MBB Premium, you only have Basic. 6-8 months.
-
Thank you for your suggestion. Your comments have been forwarded to the rules committee. - Management
-
2023/2024 CFL (Non Bombers) Off Season News
Mike replied to Noeller's topic in Blue Bomber Discussion
Thanks I hate them -
Part of me does genuinely believe Bighill may be finished as a player. Nice little chunk of change to use towards the 2025 cap if he happens to not suit up this year.
-
Those guys and I think Devin Adams are the ones I’m most excited to see. Wondering if Sy Barnett shows anything as a late camp add who didn’t play game 1 also.
-
Part of me agrees with you but part of me says “sure, except these guys are all showing signs of slowing down, all one year older, shouldn’t we see if what we think they’ve got is what they’ve still got?”
-
The narrative hasn’t changed at all, you (and others) just continually fail to grasp what my frustration has been about. I want to see these players get an apples to apples evaluation and be in a legitimate competition for a spot that *can* be won. There are several indicators that suggest this is not happening. Reps are not all equal. At this point, all things we are able to see suggest there is a very real and open competition for the last receiver spot in our starting lineup. I do wholeheartedly believe that and I don’t see anything to suggest why I shouldn’t. With that said, we still have what, eight or nine contenders and none of them are going to get a final opportunity to show their stuff with a QB with any level of experience? As I said earlier, it’s kind of a pick your poison spot - either the decision has been made and we’re keeping a lot of these guys around as a waste of time or the decision hasn’t been made and it appears that we’re not putting ourselves in the best possible position to make it. Then on defence, what are we doing? Is the MLB spot actually open or has it been given to Gauthier? I addressed that one earlier and I stand by what I said there. The other one that irritates me is safety. “can’t make the club from the tub” used to mean something, but it apparently doesn’t to BA. I’m glad these guys are getting some opportunities, I’m just not convinced they’re the best opportunities possible.
-
That’s true, debate definitely doesn’t increase engagement
