looks awesome!

 

So, I have a 70's Dieter Brock jersey. Is the third jersey too close a representation to the 70's to  buy the new third one? The 70's jersey looks a lot better than the current ones the team wears now IMO. What do you guys think?

iso, I'm in the same boat, I've got a handsome #97 Brown 70s throwback that looks great and starts conversations on the streets here in Seattle ... and 200 bones is a lot of money to spend on yet another sports jersey  ... but I was a HUGE fan of every one of the players in the photo that WBB Fan Girl linked to so I'm definitely tempted to spend the money on a #35 Jones or a #63 Walby.

 

Like a lot of posters here, I think both the 70s and 80s throwbacks look way better than the current jersey.  That royal blue looks so sharp and distinctive; the navy blue is boring and generic.

I want to have a #2 Clements jersey so I may buy one.

You ought to just be able to trade your 70s Brock in to get an 80s Clements.

You ought to just be able to trade your 70s Brock in to get an 80s Clements.

Johnzo, why would I want to trade it? That's not an option for me.

Johnzo, why would I want to trade it? I won't do that.

The fact that BlueBall (and others) will pay whatever for the jersey is probably why they're priced where they are. 

 

I think it's branding driving the price there, moreso than material & labor cost.

 

  Livin' the high life, that's how I roll.