JuranBoldenRules Posted June 29, 2017 Report Share Posted June 29, 2017 3 hours ago, bearpants said: Murray-Lawrence would not be replacing Normand... they are completely different players with mostly different skill sets... so we can eliminate that thought immediately... though I would be interested in having him as a back-up RB and returner if possible... Only so many roster spots. I think he'd be good depth but I'd rather have Flanders on the roster if possible. Also need that H-Back type for run formations. I think he'd have a tough time getting on our 44 right now. Atomic 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Goalie Posted June 30, 2017 Report Share Posted June 30, 2017 (edited) Probably Sask bound. They need all the National help they can get... I think i'd bring him in but nothing promised to him.. He would have to earn his spot. I actually really liked what Normand did last year in spot duty. Dude is a bull. Im not convinved SML is an upgrade. 9 for 65 yards. Normand 17 for 51 yards. Shaq. Edited June 30, 2017 by Goalie Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JCon Posted June 30, 2017 Report Share Posted June 30, 2017 12 hours ago, Goalie said: Probably Sask bound. They need all the National help they can get... I think i'd bring him in but nothing promised to him.. He would have to earn his spot. I actually really liked what Normand did last year in spot duty. Dude is a bull. Im not convinved SML is an upgrade. 9 for 65 yards. Normand 17 for 51 yards. Shaq. Only helps Saskatchewan if they're prepared to start him and I don't see that happening. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now