Jump to content

iHeart

Members
  • Posts

    14,295
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    4

Posts posted by iHeart

  1. 58 minutes ago, Brandon said:

    I was more so thinking that the trailer had the same music,  the same shots of a young lion standing on the rock looking over the land,   rafiki,  same shot of baby lion running between the legs of a stampede of animals,  what I assume is Timon and Pumba....  it looks very samesies as the Lion King.      

    I'll be curious if it will be another movie that people will just wait for it is free on Disney Plus and if they'll go see Sonic 3 instead?   

    Yeah for some reason they are a part of Mufasa's story (but hey new LMM songs that could be exciting... especially since he didn't contribute to Moana 2 this time) I'm curious to see how, hell I want to see how they ended up where they ended up (my theory is Mufasa was going to eat them but instead he spares them, and little did anyone know Timon and Pumbaa would repay him posthumously) I'd rather accept the Lion King 1 1/2 is cannon 

  2. 18 minutes ago, Brandon said:

    I honestly thought it was a trailer for the 2019 Lion King movie,  did they really need a Mufasa movie?    

    I'll be curious to see if it does as well as the 2019 which made a billion plus dollars.   The last many live action remakes have lost money for Disney and they've basically written off Snow White and it's 250 million dollar budget.  They need this one to succeed.   

     

    Honest? What do we really know about Mufasa? Besides being the King of Pride Rock and father to Simba? And brother to Scar

  3. 2 hours ago, Super Duper Negatron said:

    I don't know. The characters look blah. Traditional animation is so much more vibrant and expressive. Disney needs to go back to their roots. Or at least make it more cartoony if they are set on CGI.

    Money that's why. Yes it's a dumb reason and yes I wish they would try again with hand drawn animation but people look at hand drawn animation as something for children (I don't though)

  4. 2 minutes ago, kelownabomberfan said:

    Also helped that we were playing the Predators and not the Avalanche. Vancouver and Edmonton definitely have inferior opponents in Round 1 despite having worse records. 

    and yet Colorado was weak in the regular season

  5. 4 minutes ago, IC Khari said:

    If we manage to get into the playoffs again next year here's an idea, lets dispense with the whiteout, it seems to have the reverse effect on our team and fires up the opponents instead ...

    200w.gif?cid=6c09b952lycltj1whhhffftn50w

    I have a better idea, next trade deadline we acquire someone who had whatever Stastny had when we were in the playoffs and the jets don't blow all their energy on game 1

  6. 21 minutes ago, captaincanuck12 said:

    I would agree Jets were better, but Colorado had more dangerous chances.  Jets easily could.have given up a goal in the dying seconds.

    Couples thoughts:

    1. Monahan has been way too soft.   Two times he was out muscled for the puck. Including one time on the pp

    2. Ehlers is not very good.  Getting out worked and making dumb decisions with the puck. Gary Galley pointed one thing out during the broadcast that led to an Avs chance.  Think he's trying too hard.

    3. Pp was just awful.  A chance to grab some momentum and they never generated 1 shot.

    4.  Helle has been solid.   That goal against was 100% not his fault.  

    5. Lowry, Scheifs and Morrissey have been good as has Nino.  

    Anyways second period awaits.  Need solid 20 mins.

    really I thought he had been underperforming this season, he needs to get his groove back somehow

  7. Honest I still want them to last awhile, once eliminated I have to bring all the Jets books that the school library is borrowing from me home (yeah it's shocking we have books on the other Canadian teams but not the Jets I have pushed for it though)

×
×
  • Create New...