Wanna-B-Fanboy

About time. It's been an emergency for many decades.... finally some governments are recognizing it.

Wow... on fox it's like a different universe. I'm not shocked to my core, because that's what fox does... it's just the level of dishonesty in regards to fox framing the narrative here is pretty insane- even by fox-level standards.

It doesn't matter if they aren't republican senators. Wish those ******* guys would grow a spine or at least put country before party.

Damn...

Dude is a worse trump hack then I had originally thought... and trust me- I set that bar pretty ******* low.... and I am even surprised.

WHat about the right-wing conservative media? they were just as complicit... are "Near limitless , no questions asked abortion has replaced legal but rare as a new sacred cow" for the conservatives now?

That is very interesting- could you elaborate a little more please, I know very little about the suppression tactic used here. what I find fascinating in the MSM cover up claim, is that no one on the conservative-rightwing media picked it up... if both sides fail to pick up a VERY ideologically charged trail case.... that shows lack of interest and not cover up. I seriously think that the fact cameras were banned in court played a much larger role than a "leftist cover-up".

But he was found guilty for murder and imprisoned. How did the media hide from that? it was covered pretty well in print. There was no tv cameras allowed in the philly courts. The media didn't cover it up- you don't think the conservative radio scene and pundits tried really hard to push the anti-abortion narrative on this one? it didn't gain much traction because there was no tv coverage. it's pretty much that simple. in the end though... Gosnell was tried, found guilty and sentenced. for murder- thank goodness. How this ends up being like what trump made abortions out to be... no clue- that dude is pure cuckoo-bananas.

Cool article from Benjamin Wittes and his take on the Mueller report: https://www.theatlantic.com/ideas/archive/2019/04/ben-wittes-five-conclusions-mueller-report/588259/ it's a good deep dive into the Mueller report.

Newrockstars always have a good breakdown, check it out:

I don't know if your American acquaintance is going to get the opportunity to vote for trump in 2020.

I think you might be right... we saw the white walkers all lined up and then the mist enveloped the dragons- correct?

Yeah- they were lined up perfectly for a flaming strafing run.

I thought he did.... I remember both dragons scorching the AotD

it's kind of like "anyone but Hilary". There is a huge block of people who REFUSED to vote for Hilary- not only did they vote for ???- they voted instead for a self-proclaimed sexual assailant, racist, thin skinned, "I know nothing about polices" cheetoed-hued ******* man-baby. so yeah- you can answer the question now. A sack of wet kittens would do a better job at POTUS than trump.

it's slanted, sure (it's CNN and an opinion piece), but he does goes through shows what he agrees with and why- offers up facts that support why he agrees with Hewitt and then goes on and gives points as to why Hewitt is taking some liberties as to his assumption that Trump would be elected and hat it won't even be close... You should give it a read- it's a solid rebuttal.

cool- I will treat it as such.

It's an opinion piece from Hugh Hewitt- a conservative radio talk show host. It's a very slanted article. But yeah- he is totally entitled to his opinion, dude gets paid for that. I think he glosses over A LOT though and fails to acknowledge all that is working against trump in 2020.

Wow- this was on my Christmas list for the last 15 years. COuldn't happen to a slimier guy. https://www.axios.com/erik-prince-schiff-criminal-referral-house-intelligence-committee-ea4141e0-9a8b-4759-9e96-caaaadf414d2.html?utm_source=twitter&utm_medium=social&utm_campaign=organic

he's not that bad. He does make a good argument about Mueller not challenging the "can not indict a sitting president" MOU? These are extreme times that call for more than the usual conservative approach. He did it in the Bill Maher dickish way, but that is pretty on-brand for him.

Yeah, not sure what was up with the warging there...

Oh- I thought you were calling our Prime Minister a white nationalist.

He's not wrong.

The tale of Rosenstein is an interesting and complicated one. https://www.cnn.com/2019/04/18/politics/rod-rosenstein-trump-mueller/index.html

That is not an example of white nationalism. You are mistaking stupid for racism.