Jump to content

Week 12 Lions @Champs pre game talk


Geebrr

Recommended Posts

For those less mathematically inclined, we can clinch under any of the following scenarios:

1. Win 1 of our remaining games.

2. Saskatchewan has at least 2 ties or one loss in their remaining games

3. The Bombers and Riders both have a tie in one of their remaining games each respectively.

Edited by Eternal optimist
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Eternal optimist said:

For those less mathematically inclined, we can clinch under any of the following scenarios:

1. Win 1 of our remaining games.

2. Saskatchewan has at least 2 ties or one loss in their remaining games

3. The Bombers and Riders both have a tie in one of their remaining games each respectively.

Close, but not entirely accurate. In scenarios 2 or 3 either Calgary or BC could still finish ahead of us (but not both). 

Right now, the ONLY scenario in which we finish 3rd Is with BC and Sask. passing us. This week, we clinch first with a win, or a tie AND a Sask. tie or loss. Beyond this week, we would need the above scenarios you listed in 2 or 3 PLUS a loss by 20 or less to BC AND a loss by 1 point to Calgary. 

To clinch 2nd and a home playoff game this week, we require no worse than a loss by 20 to BC OR a Sask. loss. 
 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

13 minutes ago, TrueBlue4ever said:

Close, but not entirely accurate. In scenarios 2 or 3 either Calgary or BC could still finish ahead of us (but not both). 

Right now, the ONLY scenario in which we finish 3rd Is with BC and Sask. passing us. This week, we clinch first with a win, or a tie AND a Sask. tie or loss. Beyond this week, we would need the above scenarios you listed in 2 or 3 PLUS a loss by 20 or less to BC AND a loss by 1 point to Calgary. 

To clinch 2nd and a home playoff game this week, we require no worse than a loss by 20 to BC OR a Sask. loss. 
 

The Bombers don't need Saskatchewan to lose.

We are 9-1 they are 5-4.

The best they can do is get to 10 wins and we win the tie breaker.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

22 minutes ago, TrueBlue4ever said:

Close, but not entirely accurate. In scenarios 2 or 3 either Calgary or BC could still finish ahead of us (but not both). 

Right now, the ONLY scenario in which we finish 3rd Is with BC and Sask. passing us. This week, we clinch first with a win, or a tie AND a Sask. tie or loss. Beyond this week, we would need the above scenarios you listed in 2 or 3 PLUS a loss by 20 or less to BC AND a loss by 1 point to Calgary. 

To clinch 2nd and a home playoff game this week, we require no worse than a loss by 20 to BC OR a Sask. loss. 
 

You might have forgot who holds tiebreakers in some scenarios?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

15 minutes ago, wbbfan said:

I sure hope we do not see Neufeld at tackle again. That's flirting with disaster. 

Agree here.

Should try Gray since he’s more of a technician than a brawler which I believe is require more on a tackle. 

Or try any of our 2 American OL in PR.

If Yoshi’s out for a long time, I say we should try trading for Derek Dennis from Elks.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, JuranBoldenRules said:

You might have forgot who holds tiebreakers in some scenarios?

Nope, factored that in as best I could. 

2 hours ago, Geebrr said:

The Bombers don't need Saskatchewan to lose.

We are 9-1 they are 5-4.

The best they can do is get to 10 wins and we win the tie breaker.

If Sask won out or went 4-0-1 and we lost out, they would have more points than us. So a Bomber win OR a Sask loss is required (or the aforementioned combo of ties). 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

43 minutes ago, TrueBlue4ever said:

Nope, factored that in as best I could. 

If Sask won out or went 4-0-1 and we lost out, they would have more points than us. So a Bomber win OR a Sask loss is required (or the aforementioned combo of ties). 

That isn't what you said. You said a Bomber win and a Rider loss or tie. Emphasizing "and" to clinch.

We don't need the Riders to do anything if we win against BC. They can't get to 11 wins.

We have the tie breaker against Sask. 

They need to be one win ahead (11). They can't, winning out puts them at 10 wins.

Edited by Geebrr
Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 hours ago, Eternal optimist said:

For those less mathematically inclined, we can clinch under any of the following scenarios:

1. Win 1 of our remaining games.

2. Saskatchewan has at least 2 ties or one loss in their remaining games

3. The Bombers and Riders both have a tie in one of their remaining games each respectively.

If we win even just 1 of our remaining games we will still have the best record in the West at 10-4. The best record that Cgy and BC can come up is 9-5, Ssk can finish at 10-4 but we have the tie breaker.

 

Edited by M.O.A.B.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...