Jump to content

Covid-19


JCon

Recommended Posts

7 hours ago, Mark H. said:

And MB. has had days when around 1000 people were tested - Alberta has 4x the population of Manitoba

I am not sure why Manitoba's numbers seemed to be viewed as inaccurate or some kind of conspiracy.  We have been taking the same social distancing measures as other provinces, and we really only have the one large urban centre.  The rest of the population is more dispersed and less likely to have a major infection outbreak.  IMO, Manitoba's numbers are about what you'd expect. 

Let’s not forget Manitoba enacted Social Distancing at the same date as many other places but were way behind in infection rates. It has said we acted a full week early than other jurisdictions based on arrival of the virus in our area. 

7 hours ago, Tracker said:

I think the PCs ought to demonstrate leadership by meeting en masse daily without PPEs until the crisis is over.

 

From Huffington post:

Scheer 'Irresponsible' For Wanting To Resume Parliament Amid COVID-19: Trudeau

The Green Party’s Elizabeth May says her "blood is boiling" because the Conservatives seem willing to risk the public’s health for in-person meetings. 

 

OTTAWA — Prime Minister Justin Trudeau accused Conservative Leader Andrew Sheer of being “irresponsible” Sunday, while the Green Party said Scheer was holding Parliament hostage and putting people’s health in jeopardy.

 

“My blood is boiling,” Green parliamentary leader Elizaberth May told HuffPost Canada Sunday evening. “This is not acceptable.”

May was livid after Scheer refused to sign an agreement with the other parties earlier on Sunday to avoid the return of the House of Commons on Monday. 

“I’m so distressed,” the Greens’ longtime leader said. The Conservatives “refused to do what was expected,” she said, when MPs agreed to put the Commons on hold until April 20th — a date, she said, was selected as a placeholder when the pandemic was just developing. “It’s now obvious that no one should have regular Parliament meetings starting tomorrow.”

Earlier in the day, Trudeau told reporters that calling MPs back to Ottawa for regular sittings of the Parliament was irresponsible and that while he believes Parliament has a function, it has to be done responsibly.

“Right now, the Conservatives are not taking a responsible approach,” the prime minister said during his daily press conference.

Public health authorities, experts and common sense, he said, all stress that Canadians need to limit their movements.

The Liberals, he added, proposed that some MPs sit in-person once a week and that virtual sittings be added to ensure that MPs across the country have a voice.

“We know that accountability is important, and taking questions every day from the media is a good thing, but it is also important that parliamentarians and opposition politicians get to ask questions of the government, which is why we’ve proposed that the Parliament sit every week in reduced fashion, … a proposal that was accepted by most parties.  “The Conservatives need to work on it a little bit in terms of their own reflection,” the prime minister said.

Sunday, the Conservative were insisting Parliament meet in-person three days a week for two hours. 

 

Such inflammatory BS from the left. If it is safe for 30 people to meet once a week is is not so irresponsible to suggest they do it 3 times a week is it? Not once has anyone other the JT suggested that all members be in attendance. JT has only done it to try and make the Cons look bad. Can’t say that only Scheer is politicking. JT has been given a national audience everyday and had been political most days. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, GCJenks said:

Let’s not forget Manitoba enacted Social Distancing at the same date as many other places but were way behind in infection rates. It has said we acted a full week early than other jurisdictions based on arrival of the virus in our area. 

This is what I was going to say. Manitoba jumped on the restrictions early comparatively and that is one of the biggest reasons for the low numbers.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

While the lockdown is presented to public opinion as  the sole means to resolving a global public health crisis,  its devastating economic and social impacts are casually ignored.  

The unspoken truth is that the novel coronavirus provides a pretext to powerful financial interests and corrupt politicians to precipitate the entire World into a spiral of  mass unemployment, bankruptcy and extreme poverty. 

This is the true picture of what is happening.  Poverty is Worldwide. While famines are erupting in Third World countries, closer to home,  in the richest country on earth,

“millions of desperate Americans wait in long crowded lines for handouts”
“Miles-long lines formed at food banks and unemployment offices across the US over the past week”   

The ongoing 2020 Economic Crisis is tied into the logic of the COVID-19 pandemic: No need for the IMF-World Bank to negotiate a structural adjustment loan with national governments.

What has occurred under the COVID-19 crisis is a “Global Adjustment” in the structure of the World economy. In one fell swoop this Global Adjustment (GA) triggers a Worldwide process of bankruptcy, unemployment, poverty and total despair.

How is it implemented? The lockdown is presented to national governments as the sole solution to resolve the COVID-19 pandemic. It becomes a political consensus, irrespective of the devastating economic and social consequences.

This closing down operation affects production and supply lines of goods and services, (Cargill Meat Packing Plant) investment activities, exports and imports, wholesale and retail trade, consumer spending, the closing down of schools, colleges and universities, research institutions, etc.

In turn it leads almost immediately to mass unemployment, bankruptcies of small and medium sized enterprises, a collapse in purchasing power, widespread poverty and famine.

What is the underlying objective of this restructuring of the global economy?  What are the consequences? Cui Bono? 

A massive concentration of wealth and corporate capital,

the destabilization of small and middle sized enterprises in all major areas of economic activity including the services economy, agriculture and manufacturing.

facilitates the subsequent corporate acquisition of bankrupt enterprises

It derogates the rights of workers. It destabilizes labor markets.

It creates mass unemployment

It compresses wages (and labor costs) in the so-called high income “developed countries” as well as in the impoverished developing countries.

It leads to an escalation of the external debt

It facilitates subsequent privatization

It is neoliberalism to the nth degree.

Crippled by mounting debts, what is at stake is the eventual de facto privatization of the entire state structure, in different countries, at all levels of government, under the surveillance of powerful financial interests. The fiction of  “sovereign governments” serving the interests of the electors will nonetheless be maintained.

The first level of government up for privatization will be the municipalities (many of which are already partially or fully privatized, e.g. Detroit in 2013). America’s billionaires will be enticed to buy up an entire city.

Several major cities are already on the verge of bankruptcy. (This is nothing new).

Is the city of Vancouver up for privatization?: “the mayor of Vancouver has already indicated that he feared the bankruptcy of his city.” (Le Devoir, April 15, 2020)

“U.S. households collectively carry about $1 trillion in credit card debt”. No measures are being taken in the US to reduce the interest rates on credit card debt. (It is the same in Canada)

The lockdown impoverishes both the developed and developing countries and literally destroys national economies.

There is a lot of misunderstanding regarding the nature of this crisis.

Several progressive intellectuals are now saying that this crisis constitutues a defeat of neoliberalism. “It opens up a new beginning”.

Some people see it as a “potential turning point”, which opens up an opportunity to “build socialism” or “restore social democracy” in the wake of the lockdown.

The evidence amply confirms that neoliberalism has not been defeated. Quite the opposite.

Global capitalism has consolidated its clutch. Fear and panic prevail. The State is being privatized. The tendency is towards authoritarian forms of government.

That historical opportunity to confront the power structures of global capitalism, –including the US-NATO military apparatus– remains to be firmly established in wake of the lockdown.

(Borrowed liberally from an article dated April 17 by Prof Michel Chossudovsky

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Mark H. said:

Anyone who would attempt to claim that the Cargill meat packing plant should not have been shut down, even though there were dozens of cases, just lost most of their credibility. 

You won't get any argument out of me. These are all foreign workers with little if no rights. Being intimidated by management into working when in quarantine is criminal. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, J5V said:

While the lockdown is presented to public opinion as  the sole means to resolving a global public health crisis,  its devastating economic and social impacts are casually ignored.  

The unspoken truth is that the novel coronavirus provides a pretext to powerful financial interests and corrupt politicians to precipitate the entire World into a spiral of  mass unemployment, bankruptcy and extreme poverty. 

This is the true picture of what is happening.  Poverty is Worldwide. While famines are erupting in Third World countries, closer to home,  in the richest country on earth,

“millions of desperate Americans wait in long crowded lines for handouts”
“Miles-long lines formed at food banks and unemployment offices across the US over the past week”   

The ongoing 2020 Economic Crisis is tied into the logic of the COVID-19 pandemic: No need for the IMF-World Bank to negotiate a structural adjustment loan with national governments.

What has occurred under the COVID-19 crisis is a “Global Adjustment” in the structure of the World economy. In one fell swoop this Global Adjustment (GA) triggers a Worldwide process of bankruptcy, unemployment, poverty and total despair.

How is it implemented? The lockdown is presented to national governments as the sole solution to resolve the COVID-19 pandemic. It becomes a political consensus, irrespective of the devastating economic and social consequences.

This closing down operation affects production and supply lines of goods and services, (Cargill Meat Packing Plant) investment activities, exports and imports, wholesale and retail trade, consumer spending, the closing down of schools, colleges and universities, research institutions, etc.

In turn it leads almost immediately to mass unemployment, bankruptcies of small and medium sized enterprises, a collapse in purchasing power, widespread poverty and famine.

What is the underlying objective of this restructuring of the global economy?  What are the consequences? Cui Bono? 

A massive concentration of wealth and corporate capital,

the destabilization of small and middle sized enterprises in all major areas of economic activity including the services economy, agriculture and manufacturing.

facilitates the subsequent corporate acquisition of bankrupt enterprises

It derogates the rights of workers. It destabilizes labor markets.

It creates mass unemployment

It compresses wages (and labor costs) in the so-called high income “developed countries” as well as in the impoverished developing countries.

It leads to an escalation of the external debt

It facilitates subsequent privatization

It is neoliberalism to the nth degree.

Crippled by mounting debts, what is at stake is the eventual de facto privatization of the entire state structure, in different countries, at all levels of government, under the surveillance of powerful financial interests. The fiction of  “sovereign governments” serving the interests of the electors will nonetheless be maintained.

The first level of government up for privatization will be the municipalities (many of which are already partially or fully privatized, e.g. Detroit in 2013). America’s billionaires will be enticed to buy up an entire city.

Several major cities are already on the verge of bankruptcy. (This is nothing new).

Is the city of Vancouver up for privatization?: “the mayor of Vancouver has already indicated that he feared the bankruptcy of his city.” (Le Devoir, April 15, 2020)

“U.S. households collectively carry about $1 trillion in credit card debt”. No measures are being taken in the US to reduce the interest rates on credit card debt. (It is the same in Canada)

The lockdown impoverishes both the developed and developing countries and literally destroys national economies.

There is a lot of misunderstanding regarding the nature of this crisis.

Several progressive intellectuals are now saying that this crisis constitutues a defeat of neoliberalism. “It opens up a new beginning”.

Some people see it as a “potential turning point”, which opens up an opportunity to “build socialism” or “restore social democracy” in the wake of the lockdown.

The evidence amply confirms that neoliberalism has not been defeated. Quite the opposite.

Global capitalism has consolidated its clutch. Fear and panic prevail. The State is being privatized. The tendency is towards authoritarian forms of government.

That historical opportunity to confront the power structures of global capitalism, –including the US-NATO military apparatus– remains to be firmly established in wake of the lockdown.

(Borrowed liberally from an article dated April 17 by Prof Michel Chossudovsky

 

An FYI for whoever is interested in knowing more about the author of ^^.  

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Michel_Chossudovsky

Link to comment
Share on other sites

In terms of sports or any re-opening, I think we will have to wait and see what happens when areas begin to re-open officially and properly.  We can see why the idiot rallies that the end result is more sickness and spread.  Even the Church services.  Vegas desperately wants to re-open May 1 in stages and assuming they take big precautions it will be interesting to see.

Its not like there will be zero new cases or that they will wait for zero new cases.  There will be COVID for...well, maybe forever.  But widespread until there is a widely available vaccine.  And then you'll have the debate over mandatory vaccines and all those trump nuts refusing the vaccine.

Sports will be back in the summer, with no crowds.  And it will again be a measuring stick as to how successful it can be in terms of managing illness.  

Edited by The Unknown Poster
Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 hours ago, Mark H. said:

An FYI for whoever is interested in knowing more about the author of ^^.  

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Michel_Chossudovsky

Quote

Michel Chossudovsky (born 1946) is a Canadian economist, author and conspiracy theorist.  Chossudovsky has promoted 9/11 conspiracy theories.  ...was accused by NATO information warfare specialists of playing a key role in the spread of pro-Russian propaganda.

:lol:  

Edited by The Unknown Poster
Link to comment
Share on other sites

9 hours ago, Mark H. said:

An FYI for whoever is interested in knowing more about the author of ^^.  

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Michel_Chossudovsky

Just the language used is enough to know the author was a conspiracy nut. They all write in the same manner using hyperbole and opinions passed off as facts. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

This is a STUNNING U.S. study:

Government Sanctioned Suicide: Study Finds Coming Economic Crisis Could Lead to 831,600 Suicides - Or 13 Times the Number of Coronavirus Deaths https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2020/04/government-sanctioned-suicide-study-finds-coming-economic-crisis-lead-831600-suicides-13-times-number-coronavirus-deaths/

Link to comment
Share on other sites

https://www.salon.com/2020/04/20/us-experts-at-who-warned-trump-administration-about-new-coronavirus-in-real-time-last-year-report/

US experts at WHO warned Trump administration about new coronavirus in real time last year: report

Trump claimed that he had defunded WHO after the organization "missed the call" by not sounding the alarm "earlier" 

IGOR DERYSH
APRIL 20, 2020 8:28PM (UTC)

More than a dozen U.S. health experts based at the headquarters of the World Health Organization (WHO) in Geneva provided real-time information about the new coronavirus in China last year, according to a new report.

President Donald Trump announced last week that the U.S. would stop providing funding to WHO, because it allegedly "missed the call" by not sounding the alarm "months earlier." Trump, who also accused WHO of being "China-centric," has ramped up his rhetoric against the organization after numerous media reports revealed that the president and his advisers did not head warnings about the emerging pandemic from intelligence agencies, health experts, economists and even top White House aides. The president continued to downplay the threat publicly in an apparent attempt to calm the stock market.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

17 minutes ago, Tracker said:

https://www.salon.com/2020/04/20/us-experts-at-who-warned-trump-administration-about-new-coronavirus-in-real-time-last-year-report/

US experts at WHO warned Trump administration about new coronavirus in real time last year: report

Trump claimed that he had defunded WHO after the organization "missed the call" by not sounding the alarm "earlier" 

IGOR DERYSH
APRIL 20, 2020 8:28PM (UTC)

More than a dozen U.S. health experts based at the headquarters of the World Health Organization (WHO) in Geneva provided real-time information about the new coronavirus in China last year, according to a new report.

President Donald Trump announced last week that the U.S. would stop providing funding to WHO, because it allegedly "missed the call" by not sounding the alarm "months earlier." Trump, who also accused WHO of being "China-centric," has ramped up his rhetoric against the organization after numerous media reports revealed that the president and his advisers did not head warnings about the emerging pandemic from intelligence agencies, health experts, economists and even top White House aides. The president continued to downplay the threat publicly in an apparent attempt to calm the stock market.

Yeah then why in Public was the WHO saying there was no need to stop international flights in February? Seems like everyone was right but yet here we are.🙄

Link to comment
Share on other sites

20 minutes ago, blueingreenland said:

This is a STUNNING U.S. study:

Government Sanctioned Suicide: Study Finds Coming Economic Crisis Could Lead to 831,600 Suicides - Or 13 Times the Number of Coronavirus Deaths https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2020/04/government-sanctioned-suicide-study-finds-coming-economic-crisis-lead-831600-suicides-13-times-number-coronavirus-deaths/

Yup, it's the spin offs from the isolation/poverty/despair that nobody wants to talk about. The murders will go up, violent crimes, domestic abuse, when that damage is all tallied up it will make Covid 19 fatality rate look like a spit in the bucket. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...