Jump to content
Search In
  • More options...
Find results that contain...
Find results in...
Sign in to follow this  
wbbfan

Plop vs Nichols

Plop vs Nichols in the blame bowl  

24 members have voted

  1. 1. Who has to go?

    • Plop
      11
    • Nichols
      13


Recommended Posts

22 minutes ago, Nickthesizz said:

While I agree with you, I don't think Streveler will be a passer in this league. Liked what I saw from Mcguire in the preseason, hopefully he turns out.

And I understand it's hard to get them meaningful playing time.... but at some point they need a chance to move the offence if it s stalling repeatedly in a game. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
12 hours ago, Mark H. said:

Some of the stats quoted above do not compute.  Apparently we have 23 offensive TDs & 25 overall TDs.

We had 2 TDs from special teams last game and the D has at least one pick 6 - what gives? 

25 total TDs was prior to last weeks game... You can now make it 27 total TDs, 23 O, 1D, 3 kick...

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

BUT ....If we score 2 or more offensive touchdowns are we trending back upward?

I would think that if you lead a league in TD's from start..to current point..and continue to do so...you must be in a positive trend???...or am I wrong

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Just now, Booch said:

BUT ....If we score 2 or more offensive touchdowns are we trending back upward?

I would think that if you lead a league in TD's from start..to current point..and continue to do so...you must be in a positive trend???...or am I wrong

 

Must be. We have three threads going on about how terrible this team is. O, D, QB and Coaching. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
26 minutes ago, Booch said:

BUT ....If we score 2 or more offensive touchdowns are we trending back upward?

I would think that if you lead a league in TD's from start..to current point..and continue to do so...you must be in a positive trend???...or am I wrong

 

We didn't score 2 more offensive TD's so the question doesn't make any sense.

The long term data shows we are currently on top. If we continue the downward trend then we will soon lose the lead.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
22 minutes ago, 17to85 said:

Makes perfect sense if you read it correctly. If we score 2 more, as in this week score 2 more is the trend upwards.

You're using a 'What if' that didn't happen then saying it makes sense. It doesn't.

FTR: If we scored 2 more TD's, the trend would be upwards. Because we didn't happen, it doesn't matter. It's Moo Point as they say. 😎

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

This poll is ridiculous imo.  It's set up to give the appearance that every responder is in favor of getting rid of one of Lapo or Nichols. I would wager that the vast majority of Bomber fans would pick neither if it were an option....but then that doesn't advance anyone's agenda does it.

Honestly, we have a 6-2 team and we have a select few old men yelling at clouds. Fire a coach or QB of a 6-2 team....smoke some more crack.

Edited by gcn11

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
51 minutes ago, TBURGESS said:

You're using a 'What if' that didn't happen then saying it makes sense. It doesn't.

FTR: If we scored 2 more TD's, the trend would be upwards. Because we didn't happen, it doesn't matter. It's Moo Point as they say. 😎

Are you intentionally being daft or what? It's not about last week, it's about this week. As in if they score a couple td against BC is the trend upward again.

Seriously pay attention.

Edited by 17to85

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
17 minutes ago, 17to85 said:

Are you intentionally being daft or what? It's not about last week, it's about this week. As in if they score a couple td against BC is the trend upward again.

Seriously pay attention.

This week or last week or the week before... it's the same 'argument'. It's a moot point. The only difference is the tense of the statement.

Edited by TBURGESS

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
7 minutes ago, 17to85 said:

You know you could just admit you read the original comment wrong instead of doubling down on your ignorance.

Or, you could admit that what if's aren't real arguments.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
33 minutes ago, 17to85 said:

It's not what ifs, it's asking for insight into one's thought process.

'If we' and 'what if' are the same thing. You know that when folks bring up 'what ifs' that aren't Bomber positive.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
55 minutes ago, Brandon said:

It's eerie on how similar TBURGESS and 17to85 are despite having a difference in opinion on the QB.....

Has anyone ever seen them in the same place at the same time?  

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Sign in to follow this  

×
×
  • Create New...