pigseye Posted March 31, 2017 Report Share Posted March 31, 2017 (edited) Head of Dem IC has been invited to the wh to view the evidence that barry was spying on US citizens during the election (Watergate) wh encourages Flynn to testify in Russian meddling (McCarthyism) It's the Dems who have turned the clock back 50 years. They have no power in government and are only relevant when they are creating conspiracy theories. Looks good on them. And CNN's parent company, was just bought by ATT who just received that whopper contract for broadband for all first responders across the US. Won't be long before they start towing the company line too. Edited March 31, 2017 by pigseye add comment Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mark F Posted March 31, 2017 Report Share Posted March 31, 2017 (edited) gambit explained by Alex Whiting is a Professor of Practice at Harvard Law School. From 2010-13, he served as the Investigation Coordinator and the Prosecution Coordinator in the Office of the Prosecutor at the International Criminal Court. https://www.justsecurity.org/39426/explainer-flynns-request-immunity Edited March 31, 2017 by Mark F johnzo 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
do or die Posted March 31, 2017 Report Share Posted March 31, 2017 Might be too much ill will, built up between Trump administration and the US security agencies. Most of it initiated by the Donald. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jacquie Posted March 31, 2017 Report Share Posted March 31, 2017 (edited) And his deflection attempts have begun: I understand this may have been quite entertaining to see Spicey dance all over a number of topics. Edited March 31, 2017 by Jacquie Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
HardCoreBlue Posted April 1, 2017 Report Share Posted April 1, 2017 9 hours ago, The Unknown Poster said: That would be a pretty lousy prosecutor. I would think they don't just grant immunity without an idea as to what they're getting in return. They don't have to grant it at all. They could make him testify and potentially prosecute him regardless. Plus waiting risks someone else taking immunity before you can. This makes it clear why the admin was lying about Flynn and Manaforts roles a couple weeks ago. They suspected this was potentially coming. Now the back channel solution is to lean on Flynn to take a bullet for Trump and get pardoned down the road. Exactly but Trump defending and encouraging Flynn to seek immunity so he can tell the 'real' story. Sort of supports my feel of what Flynn wants to do. Get up there lie, distract and befuddle and not be formally held accountable for his words. Fits the current administration's mo. It seems at this point prosecution not falling for it. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The Unknown Poster Posted April 1, 2017 Report Share Posted April 1, 2017 I think trump just thinks he's untouchable. I think he's legitimately be baffled about why he's there.....as he's hauled to prison. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jacquie Posted April 1, 2017 Report Share Posted April 1, 2017 More deflection. SMH What a fool. The Unknown Poster 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SpeedFlex27 Posted April 1, 2017 Report Share Posted April 1, 2017 27 minutes ago, Jacquie said: More deflection. SMH What a fool. It would be interesting to really know just how popular (or lack thereof) Trump is with the American people. With his performance so far doesn't a 35% seem rather high? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jacquie Posted April 1, 2017 Report Share Posted April 1, 2017 You would think but there are enough idiots who actually believe his crap and support him to get him to 35%. Here's another example of the changes in immigration policies. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
do or die Posted April 1, 2017 Report Share Posted April 1, 2017 Enough idiots to make Trump President..... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jacquie Posted April 2, 2017 Report Share Posted April 2, 2017 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mark F Posted April 2, 2017 Report Share Posted April 2, 2017 edit Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jacquie Posted April 2, 2017 Report Share Posted April 2, 2017 Mark F 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mark F Posted April 2, 2017 Report Share Posted April 2, 2017 yes, the liberals against hillary were convinced that Trump would be less interested in war than she would have been. I read that many times, articles, comments, and the like. Don't vote for Hillary, she'll start ww 3. Every political group/party/persuasion has it's share of idiots. meanwhile... Quote HARTFORD —a key legislative committee on Wednesday approved legislation that would regulate the use of drones by law enforcement agencies and the public. the bill easily cleared the Judiciary Committee and heads to the House floor. While civilian drones would be prohibited from armaments such as guns, tear-gas canisters and other controversial equipment under the bill, police would be able to arm their drones. What could possibly go wrong. The Unknown Poster 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The Unknown Poster Posted April 3, 2017 Report Share Posted April 3, 2017 The thing about Trump's approval rating is that as it plummets, the things that turn off the majority of people will embolden the few that really love him. His base will be the racists and bigots the so-far-right-wing crowd who doesn't care who or what runs the party just as long as its their party that wins. He can never drop to 0. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bb.king Posted April 3, 2017 Report Share Posted April 3, 2017 Here is the first in a four-part series from the L.A. Times on Trump where they don't pull any punches. http://www.latimes.com/projects/la-ed-our-dishonest-president/#nt=oft12aH-1gp2 Fatty Liver, Wanna-B-Fanboy and Mark F 3 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mark F Posted April 3, 2017 Report Share Posted April 3, 2017 6 hours ago, bb.king said: Here is the first in a four-part series from the L.A. Times on Trump where they don't pull any punches. http://www.latimes.com/projects/la-ed-our-dishonest-president/#nt=oft12aH-1gp2 very good article, thanks. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
do or die Posted April 3, 2017 Report Share Posted April 3, 2017 Trump to CNN during the election campaign: "I could stand in the middle of 5th Avenue and shoot somebody and I wouldn't lose voters." Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jacquie Posted April 3, 2017 Report Share Posted April 3, 2017 7 hours ago, bb.king said: Here is the first in a four-part series from the L.A. Times on Trump where they don't pull any punches. http://www.latimes.com/projects/la-ed-our-dishonest-president/#nt=oft12aH-1gp2 Part 2 is up now and parts 3 & 4 are Tuesday and Wednesday respectively. It's been quite an interesting editorial so far. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jacquie Posted April 3, 2017 Report Share Posted April 3, 2017 Wanna-B-Fanboy and bb.king 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Fatty Liver Posted April 3, 2017 Report Share Posted April 3, 2017 (edited) On 4/2/2017 at 10:04 AM, Jacquie said: Looks like those Somalis mostly live in mud huts and have sticks so they must qualify as a threat to the USA. Good to go. Edited April 3, 2017 by Throw Long Bannatyne Wanna-B-Fanboy 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Wanna-B-Fanboy Posted April 3, 2017 Report Share Posted April 3, 2017 16 minutes ago, Jacquie said: Wow...'Muricins have a president who views the office as a side-hustle... damn. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jacquie Posted April 4, 2017 Report Share Posted April 4, 2017 The tweet referred to: Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Atomic Posted April 4, 2017 Report Share Posted April 4, 2017 24 minutes ago, Jacquie said: The tweet referred to: I think Susan Rice's actions are the real story here, not a tweet from Trump's son (who cares what Trump's son thinks) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jacquie Posted April 5, 2017 Report Share Posted April 5, 2017 5 hours ago, Atomic said: I think Susan Rice's actions are the real story here, not a tweet from Trump's son (who cares what Trump's son thinks) There's no proof she did anything. The Unknown Poster 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts