Jump to content

Bombers vs Stampeders GDT


Nolby

Recommended Posts

3 hours ago, J5V said:

I don't see why the Stamps would change their game plan much. It'll be lots of Messam until we demonstrate that we can stop him. 16 runs for 137 yards last time. At 6'3" and 263 LBs he is a load. Once you start to key on him it opens up Calgary's passing attack. If they get out to a massive lead like they did last time it could be over quick. If we can stuff Messam and let our ball hawks do their thing then we could be in good shape. The key is Messam.

Not much Messam so far - they are stopping him 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, Stickem said:

Did we actually go to Cal. with the intention of winning this game...sure couldn't tell by that first half performance....What a stinker...We don't look like we care if we're playing or not...Guess we're not in the elite part of the league yet judging by this pathetic crap.

The truth is it looks like several other starts minus the turnovers 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I didn't expect a win but had hopes. This is pathetic so far. Leaving the middle of the field wide open letting the Stamps receivers get open all day. Nichols and the offence look intimidated and out of sync. And what the hell Johnny Adams? Just fall on it for !@#$'s sake. Maybe they can make it respectable in the 2nd half.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

22 minutes ago, Mark H. said:

If he hadn't touched it, it would have been no yards. The players who recovers for the 'dribbling team' has to be onside. 

Duane Ford just shot that theory down. Only considered a kick if it had gone out of bounds (according to Forde). If Calgary had touched it first they would have been penalized, but we touched it and did Calgary a huge solid. Adams should have just fallen on it. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

13 minutes ago, Brandon Blue&Gold said:

Duane Ford just shot that theory down. Only considered a kick if it had gone out of bounds (according to Forde). If Calgary had touched it first they would have been penalized, but we touched it and did Calgary a huge solid. Adams should have just fallen on it. 

Not a theory at all, that's the rule for a dribbled ball, which is what the call was. You have to be onside in order to recover a dribbled ball, which was negated when Adams touched it

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...