WBBFanWest

And yet, there are tons of people in Saskatchewan who have no issue with that at all.

And yet, there are tons of people in Saskatchewan who have no issue with that at all.

And yet, there are tons of people in Saskatchewan who have no issue with that at all.

And yet, there are tons of people in Saskatchewan who have no issue with that at all.

that's three things

**** the CFL haters. Never include them in any equation.

that's three things

Blue Bomber Discussion
It's in the description of the forum...

Nope.  I had to learn, feel free to do the same and that's not just googling "constructive dismissal" and posting the first definition you find.

Blue Bomber Discussion
It's in the description of the forum...

Blue Bomber Discussion
It's in the description of the forum...

Not that simple in all cases. Some people (whether others think it's a legitimate reason or not) are financially dependent on that job which puts them in them in a very stressful situation in what to do moving forward.

Nope.  I had to learn, feel free to do the same and that's not just googling "constructive dismissal" and posting the first definition you find.

Yes, because complaints like this get you so much great attention...

I wonder how we’d be reacting to this news if it were about Dalton Schoen 

If he did what she says he did, then I 100% hope he's gone and never comes back. **** any ******* that tries that greasy **** on women.... and that goes double for Murphy, if he did what she says he did. He's even worse for trying to sweep it under the rug. *IF* what she says is true, they should both be long, gone and forgotten. 

Dude, it happens all the time in various lines of work. The investigation focuses on policies and procedures.  If the company is smart, they hire an outside agency (often a law firm) to conduct the inquiry, which is an employment matter and completely separate from any other civil matter. It's actually the opposite of the tar and feather stuff you're accusing people of, but hey righteous indignation feels so good, right?

Not at all true.  An employer can initiate their own investigation.  They can also suspend anyone involved until such time as the investigation concludes.  It's actually a good idea to do so, for liability purposes.

Not at all true.  An employer can initiate their own investigation.  They can also suspend anyone involved until such time as the investigation concludes.  It's actually a good idea to do so, for liability purposes.

Not at all true.  An employer can initiate their own investigation.  They can also suspend anyone involved until such time as the investigation concludes.  It's actually a good idea to do so, for liability purposes.

Not at all true.  An employer can initiate their own investigation.  They can also suspend anyone involved until such time as the investigation concludes.  It's actually a good idea to do so, for liability purposes.

The employer has not only a right but a duty to protect employees from a toxic workplace, and can be named jointly in any civil suit if they did not act according to team/league/ societal standards. And remember- in a civil suit the plaintiff does not have to establish proof beyond a reasonable doubt, but just a simple preponderance of evidence. 

But, but, but, Bluto's a great guy...  Anyone who would put a child's game played by grown men ahead of wanting to see that if they did something as despicable as this is described to have happened is, in my opinion, not such a great guy.  When you have a daughter have to deal with sexual violence, there can be zero tolerance for this kind of ****.  

But, but, but, Bluto's a great guy...  Anyone who would put a child's game played by grown men ahead of wanting to see that if they did something as despicable as this is described to have happened is, in my opinion, not such a great guy.  When you have a daughter have to deal with sexual violence, there can be zero tolerance for this kind of ****.